Sensus Wijonarko


The aim of this study was to investigate the main purpose for the application of double layer tipping bucket sensors based on the existing double layer tipping bucket sensor in Tegal Climatological Station, Indonesian Agency for Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics. Hydraulic to electric analogy and rainfall interception models from Calder, Rutter, and Gash were used as the investigation method. The result showed that double layer tipping bucket sensors were dedicated to measure high intensity rainfalls.


double layer tipping bucket sensor, rainfall, rain intensity, hydraulic to electric analogy, low pass filter

Full Text:



Maftukhah, T., S. Wijonarko, & D. Rustandi 2016. Comparison and correlation among measurement results of observatory, Hellman, and tipping bucket sensors. Instrumentasi scientific publication, vol. 40 (1): 7 -14.

[ Goodison, B.E., P.Y.T. Louie & D. Yang, 1998. WMO solid precipitation measurement intercomparison. Final report. WMO/TD - No. 872.

Yang, D., B.E. Goodison, J.R. Metcalfe, V.S. Golubev, R. Bates,T. Pangburn, C.L. Hanson, 1996. Accuracy of NWS 80 Standard Nonrecording Precipitation Gauge: Results and Application of WMO Intercomparison.

Lanza, L., M. Leroy, C. Alexandropoulos, L. Stagi, & W. Wauben. WMO laboratory intercomparison of rainfall intensity gauges, De Bilt (The Netherlands), Genoa (Italy), & Trappes (France), September 2004 September 2005. Final report, 63 p.

Lanza L.G. & L. Stagi. Quality standards for rain intensity measurements. Genova, 4 p.

WMO 2008. WMO-No. 8, Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation. Pp: 1.6.1.

WMO 2006. WMO-No. 49: Technical Regulations, Volume III Hydrology. P: x.

WMO 2008. WMO-No. 168: Guide to Hydrological Practices, Volume I, Hydrology – From Measurement to Hydrological Information. Geneva, 10 chapter.

WMO 2009. WMO-No. 168: Guide to Hydrological Practices Volume II. Management of Water Resources and Application of Hydrological Practices.

WMO-No. 488, 2007. Guide to the Global Observing System. Geneva, 8 parts.

Hampton, C.R., 2016. Build a Wireless “Tipping Bucket” Rain Gauge, Part 1—Assembling the Bucket. November 17, 2017.

Hampton, C.R., 2016. Build a Wireless “Tipping Bucket” Rain Gauge, Part 2—Adding the Transmitter. November 17, 2017.

Hampton, C.R., 2016. Build a Wireless “Tipping Bucket” Rain Gauge, Part 3—Receiver, PICAXE, and LCD. November 17, 2017.

Plummer, N., T. Allsopp, T., & J.A. Lopez, 2003. WMO/TD No. 1185: Guidelines on Climate Observation Networks and Systems. 57 p.

Belfort. Tipping bucket automated precipitation gauge. 4p.

Belfort. Automated weighing precipitation gauges. 3 p.

Environmental Measurements Limited. ARG100 – Rainfall Intensity Adjustments. North Shields, 5 p.

Wijonarko, S. & Maftukhah, T., 2016. Instrumentation system for water balance measurements on Serkuk Subbasin, Kubu Watershed, Belitung. 10.1063/1.4953930.

Wijonarko, S., Maftukhah, T., Rustandi, D. (2017). The compartment area calculation for rainrose measurements. Sedang direview.

Wijonarko, S. & T. Maftukhah 2014. Instrumentation Development for Rainfall Interseption Measurement on a Tree using Water Balance. Jurnal Ilmiah Instrumentasi. Vol:38 No:2 2014.

Wikipedia. Hydraulic analogy. Taken in November 14, 2017.

Verbeeck, H., K. Steppe, N. Nadezhdina, M.O.D. Beeck, G. Deckmyn, L. Meiresonne, R. Lemeur, J. Cermak, R. Ceulemans, and I.A. Janssens, 2007. Stored water use and transpiration in Scots pine: a modeling analysis with ANAFORE. Tree Physiology, 27: 1671-1685.

Wang, S., 2008. Simulation of evapotranspiration and its response to plant water and CO2 transfer dynamics, Journal of Hydrometeorology, 9: 426-443.

Calder, I.R., 1977. A model of transpiration and interception loss from a spruce forest in Plynlimon, Central Wales. Journal of Hydrology, 33 (1977): 247 – 265.

Calder, I.R., 1986. A stochastic model of rainfall interception. Journal of Hydrology, 89 (1986): 65-71.

Calder, I.R., 1996. Rainfall interception and drop size-development and calibration of the two-layer stochastic interception model. Tree Physiology, 16: 727-732.

Calder, I.R., 1999. Dependence of rainfall on drop size – a reply to the comment by Uijlenhoet and Stricker. Journal of Hydrology, 217 (1999): 164-165.

Calder, I.R., I.R. Wright, and D. Murdiyarso, 1986. A study of evaporation from tropical rain forest – West Java. Journal of Hydrology, 89 (1986): 13-31.

Calder, I.R., 1996. Dependence of rainfall interception on drop size: 1. Development of the two-layer stochastic model. Journal of Hydrology, 185 (1996): 363-378.

Calder, I.R., R.C. Hall, P.T.W. Rosier, H.G. Bastable, and K.T. Prasanna, 1996. Dependence of rainfall interception on drop size: 2. Experimental determination of the wetting functions and two-layer stochastic model parameters for five tropical tree species. Journal of Hydrology, 185 (1996): 379-388.

Calder, I.R., R.L. Hall, H.G. Bastable, H.M. Gunston, O. Shela, A. Chirwa, and R. Kafundu, 1995. The impact of land use change on water resources in sub-Saharan Africa: a modeling study of Lake Malawi. Journal of Hydrology, 170 (1995): 123 – 135.

Hall, R.L., 1992. An improved numerical implementation of Calder’s stochastic model of rainfall interception – a note. Journal of Hydrology, 140 (1992): 389-392.

Rutter, A.J., K.A. Kershaw, P.C. Robins, and A.J. Morton, 1971. A predictive model of rainfall interception in forests, I. Derivation of the model from observations in a plantation of Corsican pine. Agric. Meteorol., 9 (1971/1972): 367-384.

Rutter, A.J., A.J. Morton, and P.C. Robins, 1975. A predictive model of rainfall interception in forests, II. Generalization of the model and comparison with observations in some coniferous and hardwood stands. Journal of Applied Ecology, 12: 367-380.

Gash, J.H.C. and A.J. Morton, 1978. An application of the Rutter model to the estimation of the interception loss from thetford Forest. Journal of Hydrology, 38 (1978): 49-58.

Gash, J.H.C., C.R. Lloyd, and G. Lachaud, 1995. Estimating sparse forest rainfall interception with an analytical model. Journal of Hydrology, 170 (1995): 79-86.

Valente, F., J.S. David, and J.H.C. Gash, 1997. Modelling interception loss for two sparse eucalypt and pine forsts in central Portugal using reformulated Rutter and Gash analytical models. Journal of Hydrology, 190: 141-162.

Pearce, A.J, J.H.C. Gash and J.B. Stewart, 1980. Rainfall interception in a forest stand estimated from grassland meteorological data. Journal of Hydrology, 46: 147-163.

van Dijk, A.I.J.M. & Bruijnzeel, L.A., 2001. Modeling rainfall interception by vegetation of variable density using an adapted analytical model. Part 2. Model validation for a tropical upland mixed cropping system. Journal of Hydrology, Volume 247, pp. 239-262.

Zeng, N., Shuttleworth, J.W. & Gash, J.H.C., 2000. Influence of temporal variability of rainfall on interception loss. Part I. Point analysis. Journal of Hydrology, Volume 228, pp. 228–241.

Rodrigo, A. & Àvila, A., 2001. Influence of sampling size in the estimation of mean throughfall in two Mediterranean holm oak forests. Journal of Hydrology, Volume 66, pp. 143-158.

Lanza, L.G., E. Vuerich, & I. Gnecco, 2010. Analysis of highly accurate rain intensity measurements from a field test site. Adv. Geosci., 25, 37–44.

Stagnaro, M., M. Colli, Luca G Lanza, and P.W. Chan, 2016. Performance of post-processing algorithms for rainfall intensity using measurements from tipping-bucket rain gauges. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 5699–5706.


Copyright (c) 2018 Instrumentasi

Copyright &copy 2015 Jurnal Instrumentasi (p-ISSN: 0125-9202, e-ISSN:2460-1462). All Rights Reserved.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.